Skip to content

The technology of baby monitors…

Baby monitorsRemember I warned you that anything of interest to me was fair game for The Robservatory? Well, here's the first non-Mac-related post, but it's at least vaguely technology related.

My wife and I have a nearly two-year-old daughter, Kylie. Way back when at the baby shower, someone gave us The First Year's 900 MHz Two Receiver Monitor set. For those without children, the purpose of these devices is to dramatically increase the stress level in new parents. After placing the transmitter in the child's room, the receivers pick up the child's every sound. So basically, every noise your child makes at night or while napping becomes something new to worry about -- "Honey, did that breath sound labored? Is she getting a cold? Did you remember the blanket, I think her teeth are chattering! Is she breathing? I can't hear her now -- quick, go check on her!!"

In all seriousness, these are very handy devices for monitoring your child without having to sit outside the door to their room. In our case, Kylie's room is upstairs and on the other side of the house from ours, and I sleep quite soundly, so I really need the speaker to jar me awake in case she needs something overnight. So why am I talking about monitors here? While our unit worked well at first, it had recently started to get very noisy. Every so often (like 10 times a minute, really!), we'd get a loud burst of static, or very loud "white noise" sound that would last 20 seconds or so. Sometimes we could even hear half of the neighbor's phone conversations.

During the day, this is just slightly annoying. At night, though, it's a sleep depriver: set the unit loud enough to hear Kylie's cries, and the static bursts will wake even me from a deep sleep. It has gotten so bad that I have taken to just turning it off at night -- hardly the behavior conducive to monitoring one's child! We have moved the receiver and the transmitter to many different locations, but the interference persists. While I'm not sure of the cause, there are so many waves running around the airspace in our home (Bluetooth, Airport Express, Airport Extreme, cordless phones, cell phones) that it could be almost anything.

Tired (literally) of the lost sleep over static, I set out on a mission to find a better solution. The geek in me, of course, wanted to set up a Mac mini with an iSight, iGlasses to see in the dark, and a PowerBook in our bedroom to monitor the audio and video from Kylie's room. For some reason, my wife was against that plan, go figure!

Instead, I did some net digging, and eventually found that The First Year's makes a 2.4GHz Ultra-Range Monitor (also pictured above right). I really don't care about the range, but I was hoping that the different frequency might mean the end of the interference. After some scouring, we found a set in a local store and took them home late last week. After a few nights' worth of testing, I'm very pleased (and very well rested!) to report that they work perfectly. I have yet to hear even a peep of interference, and the audio is crystal clear. These things are a bit more money than the 900MHz models ($75 vs $50 or so, I think). But if you're a parent using a noisy 900MHz model, this unit is well worth the extra cash. No more unexpected static noise jolts waking me up in the middle of the night ... now it's just Kylie! :)

9 thoughts on “The technology of baby monitors…”

  1. Wow, all that static sounds bad! :^o

    As for the Mac Mini plan, it actually sounded quite cool… Maybe something to package and sell here — the iBaby Monitor? ;^)

    I only gave iGlasses a quick try but I must admit it has me stumped as the "see in the dark" function seems to do what it claims. How that is possible without special hardware, though, is beyond me…

    FJ

  2. High exposure plus using green-scale color to make it easy to see differences, plus a few other things...

  3. My experience over seven years and about 4 different monitors is that they _all_ start doing the static thing sooner or later. New ones are nice and quite. After about 18 months or so, they start to get crackly and those random (yet frequent) bursts start to show up. Dunno why they get like that, but they do.

  4. I have done the iChat baby monitor trick several times. I live in a neighborhood where there are many townhouses clustered together (university housing for families) so it isn't very far from my house to our friend's. Unfortunately, the baby monitor doesn't reach very far, perhaps next door but no further. If we want to go to a friends house to watch a movie it's simple to set up a video or audio iChat and monitor anything that happens. If it does, it's a 30 second run back home to save the day. (I love being a hero to my kids!)

    A cheaper option if you don't have a laptop and a friend with the same is to buy two motorola two-way radios. They work quite well as ababy monitors.
    Jeremy

  5. My wife and I have noticed the same gathering burst of static in all of our cordless 900 MHz phones--again, it's very strange; it can't be ambient interference, since they only start doing it after a year or so. I wonder if there isn't some kind of shielding that degrades, or if this is just built-in obsolescence to sell more phone (and baby monitors).

    Rob started off the article in jest by suggesting that "the purpose of these devices is to dramatically increase the stress level in new parents." I have to say that this is, of course, exactly how all security measures (alarm systems, especially) are marketed to consumers, and, as soon as my son was born, I saw a lot of really shameless marketing aimed at anxious new parents. I can see how monitors are useful, especially for the "next door neighbor's pizza and a movie" scenario that jeremit0 describes--but we never bought one. People were astonished at that, and often very anxious themselves, but it's the reason that babies evolved the ability to cry very loudly. Very, very loudly. Very, very, very loudly.

  6. Rob: Yea, they can cry very loudly. But you're looking at a guy who has slept through a fire alarm going off in the hallway outside his (open!) door. It woke my mother three floors up, but I just slept right through it.

    So when my wife's not around, the monitor is my assurance that I'll hear her (it's turned up quite loud, and right by my ear!). But I agree, the 'fear marketing' is a very real occurrence, and it is sad...

    -rob.

  7. Our baby monitor did that as well. I'm a Radio Ham as well as professional-type payload engineer, so I did the only thing possible in the circumstances. I took it apart.

    Our (UK model, different frequency, different standards) monitor is an FM thingie with a couple of selectable channels. There is a really nastily cheap oscillator in the transmitter than sets the exact channel frequency and another in the receiver that collects and demodulates it. Overtime these start to drift, especially as temperature changes, and what we were hearing was the receiver having to work harder and harder to maintain lock. A twiddle with a screwdriver fixed it.

    My uber-geek baby monitor...

    Logitech USB web-cam
    USB Thermometer with the sensor on the crib mattress.
    Old USB microphone
    USB Hub
    A really nifty "Bluetooth USB Cable" we picked up in Japan. (This does exactly what it says on the box, you have a square USB dongle at one end and a flat one at the other. Instant cableless cable.)

    A short apple script that alternately grabs a single frame of video and samples the temperature with more or less constant audio monitoring and you have the world's slowest CCTV, fully telemetered baby.

  8. After going through 4 really nice but too-fragile EvenFlo monitors, we finally got a Sony. It's brilliant. Our only issue has been that the AC cords wear out pretty quickly, so if you get one, be gentle with the plug/unplug process. Good luck! You've got the MOST valuable Mac site out there. Keep it up.

Comments are closed.